Demola v. Metropolitan Dade County (713 So. 2d 1118, 1998)

Florida District Court of Appeal 1998-07-29

Citations

Full opinion text

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

FLETCHER and SHEVIN, JJ., concur.

COPE, Judge,

dissenting.

Because appellant was acting consistently with advice given by counsel, see Chery v. Flagship Airlines, Inc., 692 So.2d 213 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997), I do not believe that he can be viewed as guilty of “misconduct” for purposes of the unemployment compensation law. See Hummer v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 573 So.2d 135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).