State, Department of Revenue ex rel. Jones v. Zapata (723 So. 2d 395, 1999)

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order on motion for contempt insofar as it modifies the obligor’s arrearage installment payment amount. The modification issue was not raised by appropriate pleadings, and the opponent was not given notice and opportunity to be heard on the issue. See Moody v. Moody, 721 So.2d 731, 23 Fla. L. Weekly D1424 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998); see generally Gibson v. Bennett, 561 So.2d 565 (Fla.1990).

Reversed and remanded.