Grant v. State (731 So. 2d 735, 1999)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Williamson v. United States, 512 U.S. 594, 114 S.Ct. 2431, 129 L.Ed.2d 476 (1994)(confessions of arrested accomplices admissible if truly self-inculpa-tory, rather than attempt to shift blame or curry favor); Franqui v. State, 699 So.2d 1312 (Fla.1997)(same); Smith v. State, 699 So.2d 629 (Fla.1997)(setting forth circumstances in which non-testifying codefend-ant’s redacted confession is admissible with limiting jury instruction).