Ehrlich v. Park Place Owners Ass'n (764 So. 2d 1, 1998)

PER CURIAM.

The trial court erred in directing a verdict at the close of appellant’s case. There was an issue of fact as to whether appellee violated a duty of reasonable care in maintaining the premises. See Lotto v. Point East Two Condominium Corp. Inc., 702 So.2d 1361 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1997).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER, SHAHOOD and GROSS, JJ., concur.