Mandri v. State (767 So. 2d 523, 2000)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000); State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING/CERTIFICATION

PER CURIAM.

We deny defendant’s motion for rehearing. We grant defendant’s motion to certify the following question of great public importance:

WHERE A TRIAL COURT FAILS TO FILE WRITTEN REASONS IN SUPPORT OF A GUIDELINES DEPARTURE SENTENCE BUT, THEREAFTER, IN RESPONSE TO A FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.800(B) MOTION FILED BY DEFENDANT, DOES FILE WRITTEN REASONS JUSTIFYING THE DEPARTURE, IS DEFENDANT ENTITLED TO A REVERSAL AND A REMAND FOR A GUIDELINES SENTENCE, UNDER MADDOX v. STATE, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000)?

Question certified.