Hall v. State (770 So. 2d 702, 2000)

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of appellant’s 3.850 motion. Appellant’s oath suffers from the same deficiencies identified in Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla.1985).

BARFIELD, C.J., ERVIN and WOLF, JJ., concur.