Moore v. State (770 So. 2d 1291, 2000)

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

Charles Moore challenges the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief upon the grounds that the motion was untimely. The state properly concedes that the motion was timely filed within two years of the date of the mandate in his direct appeal. See Huff v. State, 569 So.2d 1247 (Fla.1990). Accordingly, the denial of the motion is reversed and remanded for consideration of the merits of Moore’s claim.