Sneed v. State (778 So. 2d 509, 2001)

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was sentenced to concurrent equal sentences as both a habitual offender and a prison releasee reoffender. The state concedes that resentencing is required pursuant to Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000). We therefore reverse and remand for resentencing in accordance with Grant.

WARNER, C.J., POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.