Dixson v. State (785 So. 2d 744, 2001)

Florida District Court of Appeal 2001-05-30

Citations

Full opinion text

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rhodes v. State, 701 So.2d 388 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)(Neither defense attorney nor trial court is required to warn defendant of sentence-enhancing consequences that defendant’s plea will have as to any future crimes defendant may commit; neither trial court nor defense counsel has duty to anticipate defendant’s recidivism.)