Citations

Full opinion text

PER CURIAM.

We affirm in part the order denying Appellant’s motion for postconviction relief. Our affirmance is without prejudice to Appellant’s right to refile his second and third grounds for relief, concerning his habitual offender sentencing and the calculation of his sentencing guidelines score-sheet, in a proper amended motion that includes the history of any prior attempts at collateral relief. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(c), 3.987; Woods v. State, 740 So.2d 600 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999). However, Appellant’s first ground, alleging ineffective assistance of trial counsel in failing to file a notice of appeal of the conviction and sentence, should have been dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Such claims are to be raised by petition for belated appeal, filed in the appellate court to which the appeal should have been taken. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.141(c).

Affirmed in part without prejudice; reversed in part, and remanded.

GUNTHER, WARNER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.