Mapp v. State (790 So. 2d 1273, 2001)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Thomas v. State, 748 So.2d 970 (Fla.1999)(standard of review is whether, under the totality of the circumstances, judge’s actions were coercive); Scoggins v. State, 726 So.2d 762 (Fla. 1999)(eourt’s knowledge of jury’s numerical division does not require reversal where totality of circumstances does not show a coercive influence).