Davis v. State (802 So. 2d 484, 2001)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Major v. State, 790 So.2d 550 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). We also certify the same question as in Major:

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAS A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?