Bush v. State (813 So. 2d 974, 2002)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. As we did in Stretcher v. State, 803 So.2d 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001), we certify the following question:

WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT OR COUNSEL HAVE A DUTY TO ADVISE A DEFENDANT THAT HIS PLEA IN A PENDING CASE MAY HAVE SENTENCE ENHANCING CONSEQUENCES IF THE DEFENDANT COMMITS A NEW CRIME IN THE FUTURE?

STONE, SHAHOOD, and MAY, JJ„ concur.