Sanchez v. State (818 So. 2d 684, 2002)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Nicarry v. State, 795 So.2d 1114, 1116 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (holding that “the breaking into a building or structure for the purpose of continuing an offense in progress [such as fleeing and eluding] is sufficient to establish burglary.”).

SHAHOOD, GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.