Comesana v. State (831 So. 2d 819, 2002)

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence as we find any claimed error on the challenged evidentiary rulings to be invited and/or harmless. See Czubak v. State, 570 So.2d 925, 928 (Fla.1990)(under invited error doctrine, party may not make or invite error and then take advantage of error on appeal); Phillips v. State, 739 So.2d 632, 632 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999)(eviden-tiary issues were subject to harmless error analysis and not reversible when they did not affect the verdict).