M.L. v. Department of Children & Family Services (840 So. 2d 409, 2003)

PER CURIAM.

Upon the conclusion that it is neither “clearly erroneous [n]or lacking in eviden-tiary support,” E.K.B. v. Department of Children & Families, 724 So.2d 720, 721 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), the order below terminating the appellant mother’s parental rights is affirmed.

GERSTEN, J., and NESBITT, Senior Judge, concur.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge

(dissenting).

I dissent on the basis of the views expressed in S.D. v. Department of Children & Family Servs., 805 So.2d 10, 16 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(Schwartz, C.J., dissenting).