Crawford v. City National Bank (851 So. 2d 897, 2003)

Florida District Court of Appeal 2003-08-13

Citations

Full opinion text

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 222.11(l)(c), Florida Statutes (2002); Mazzella v. Boinis, 617 So.2d 1156 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993), review dismissed, 626 So.2d 203 (Fla.1993); In re Barncastle, 8 B.R. 464 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1981).

LEVY and FLETCHER, JJ., concur.

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge

(specially concurring).

I entirely agree with affirmance, notwithstanding that my failure to adhere to the rule that cases should be decided on the basis they were litigated below and argued on appeal led to the vehement expression of views at oral argument which, it was soon revealed, were contrary to the law of Florida. No harm done except to my (heretofore monumental) legal ego.