Williams v. State (858 So. 2d 1273, 2003)

PER CURIAM.

Because the evidence does not support the conclusion that, as alleged, the appellant deliberately falsified statements in his post-conviction motions, the order adjudicating him in contempt for doing so is reversed with directions to dismiss the contempt proceeding. See Brown v. State, 579 So.2d 898 (Fla. 4th DCA1991).