Sanchez v. State (866 So. 2d 218, 2004)

PER CURIAM.

Based on the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse and remand for resen-tencing as the defendant had a right to be present and represented by counsel at his resentencing following his successful 3.850 challenge. Jordan v. State, 853 So.2d 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Barcelo v. State, 774 So.2d 895 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). The remaining point raised by the defendant lacks merit.

Reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing.