Reigh v. State (882 So. 2d 435, 2004)

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s revocation of appellant’s probation. The condition of probation that appellant “attend and complete” an anger management program specified neither a program nor the time when the program had to be completed. See Markel v. State, 855 So.2d 719 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); O’Neal v. State, 801 So.2d 280 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Willis v. State, 727 So.2d 952 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998); Archer v. State, 604 So.2d 561 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). We note the record contains a letter which indicates that appellant completed an anger management program while he was incarcerated for the violation of probation.

FARMER, C.J., GROSS and MAY, JJ., concur.