State v. D.E.R. (887 So. 2d 441, 2004)

PER CURIAM.

Based upon our conclusion that the record evidence fully supports the trial court’s finding that the police lacked reasonable suspicion to conduct a pat down search of the appellee/juvenile, we affirm the order granting the motion to suppress. See Ray v. State, 849 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Coleman v. State, 723 So.2d 387 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); E.H. v. State, 593 So.2d 243 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

Affirmed.