Luma v. State (903 So. 2d 302, 2005)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Forcelledo v. State, 898 So.2d 1058 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005)(“The State is allowed to give notice under as many classifications as it chooses, where the State is prepared to show the defendant meets the statutory criteria.”); Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002)(notice deficiency does not render a sentence “illegal” for the purposes of a rule 3.800 petition; claim should have been raised via 3.850 and is now time barred).