Powell v. State (906 So. 2d 1139, 2005)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Sampson v. State, 798 So.2d 824, 826 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)(finding that the issue of a general notice of enhancement was not preserved for appellate review because the defendant did not argue that the notice was deficient); Cook v. State, 816 So.2d 773, 774 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002)(stating that “[t]he proper vehicle to challenge the State’s alleged failure to properly seek habitual felony offender sentencing is a motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.”).