Coleman v. State (916 So. 2d 54, 2005)

PER CURIAM.

William Edward Coleman appeals his convictions for kidnapping, robbery, battery and trespass. The sole claim of error is that the trial court should not have admitted certain statements made by the victim under the hearsay exemption for excited utterances. We affirm on authority of Bell v. State, 847 So.2d 558 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003), review denied, 859 So.2d 513 (Fla.2003).

Affirmed.