Grant v. State (917 So. 2d 990, 2005)

PER CURIAM.

While we affirm on the merits, we additionally note that in support of the defendant’s argument below he relied on State v. Finder, 375 So.2d 836 (Fla.1979), and Goss v. State, 398 So.2d 998 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). In response, the State argued that, there were factual distinctions between the cited cases and the present case, and the trial court agreed. The cases relied upon by the defendant however, are no longer good law. See State v. Enmund, 476 So.2d 165 (Fla.1985).

Affirmed.