Simmons v. State (924 So. 2d 970, 2006)

PER CURIAM.

Clarence Simmons appeals his judgment and sentence for possession of marijuana and trafficking in cocaine. Although the trial court erroneously allowed the State to introduce inadmissible hearsay statements regarding Simmons under the guise of impeachment, we conclude such error was harmless. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986).

Affirmed.

ALTENBERND, SALCINES, and KELLY, JJ., concur.