McCarty v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission (930 So. 2d 846, 2006)

PER CURIAM.

No error has been demonstrated in the ruling of the appeals referee as affirmed by the Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, that the appellant was disqualified from benefits because of misconduct for repeated absences and tardiness. See Mason v. Load King Mfg. Co., 758 So.2d 649 (Fla.2000); Sanchez v. Dep’t of Labor & Employment Sec., 411 So.2d 313 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982).

Affirmed.