Citations
- 935 So. 2d 639
Full opinion text
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of June 2, 2006, the Court has determined that, because the administrative order on appeal, titled “Notice of Final Order,” entered on September 22, 2005, has not been filed with the agency clerk, it has not been rendered. See Hill v. Div. of Ret., 687 So.2d 1376, 1377 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature. This dismissal is without prejudice to the appellant’s right to file a timely appeal from this order once it has been rendered.
KAHN, C.J., BARFIELD, and ALLEN, JJ., concur.