Acee v. State (935 So. 2d 1258, 2006)

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Bell v. State, 895 So.2d 1290 (Fla. 5th DCA 2005) (holding “a claim ... that a defendant should have been sentenced by the judge who accepted the plea must be preserved to be cognizable on appeal”); Davis v. State, 783 So.2d 288, 289 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001) (“The withdrawal of a guilty plea is not a matter of right, but ... a question addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court.”); Kent v. State, 702 So.2d 265, 266 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (stating that allegations of memory loss and a failure to understand the seriousness of penalties are not necessarily sufficient grounds to require a competency hearing); Johnson v. State, 648 So.2d 263 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (“Where the mistake or misunderstanding in entering a plea is attributable to the defendant, it is not error for the court to refuse to allow withdrawal of it.”)

THOMPSON, SAWAYA and LAWSON, JJ., concur.