Cargile v. State (939 So. 2d 166, 2006)

Florida District Court of Appeal 2006-09-29

Citations

Full opinion text

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Our affirmance is without prejudice to whatever right Mr. Cargile may have to file a facially sufficient motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.853. See Hitchcock v. State, 866 So.2d 23 (Fla.2004).

CASANUEVA, STRINGER, and VILLANTI, JJ., Concur.