Robinson v. State (943 So. 2d 868, 2006)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Appellant’s motion for post-conviction relief was untimely and successive. In addition, his claim based upon Roberts v. State, 874 So.2d 1225 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004), rev. denied sub nom. State v. West, 892 So.2d 1014 (Fla.2005), is also barred, as Roberts does not apply retroactively. See Ulcena v. State, 925 So.2d 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006).

WARNER, FARMER and MAY, JJ„ concur.