Frazier v. State (943 So. 2d 917, 2006)

PER CURIAM.

In light of the circuit court’s order directing the State Attorney to file a response, we find that the granting of mandamus relief to compel a ruling on petitioner’s pending motion for postcon-viction relief is not warranted. See Munn v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 807 So.2d 733 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Therefore, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus but we strongly encourage the circuit court to promptly rule on petitioner’s motion for postconviction relief. See Wiley v. State, 919 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006).

BARFIELD, WEBSTER, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.