Ordonez-Medina v. State (944 So. 2d 550, 2006)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Irizarry v. State, 905 So.2d 160 (Fla. 3d DCA 2005) (trial court’s ruling on a motion for judgment of acquittal is affirmed on appeal if a rational trier of fact could find the existence of the elements of the offense beyond a reasonable doubt), review denied, 917 So.2d 194 (Fla.2005); Lee v. State, 869 So.2d 1251 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004) (admission of hearsay harmless beyond a reasonable doubt where it was cumulative of other evidence).