Bailey v. State (954 So. 2d 1264, 2007)

PER CURIAM.

We agree that the trial court improperly sustained certain hearsay objections. However, such errors were harmless because the witness was later able to testify to those matters which had initially been wrongfully excluded. Wallace v. State, 766 So.2d 364, 371-72 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000); see also Turner v. State, 809 So.2d 59, 62 (Fla. 5th DCA 2002).

AFFIRMED.

PLEUS, C.J., ORFINGER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.