Knowles v. State (968 So. 2d 623, 2007)

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s order that denied appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion as successive, but echo the trial court’s warning to appellant that his continual filing of proeedurally barred or otherwise non-meritorious claims will result in proceedings to determine appropriate sanctions. See State v. Spencer, 751 So.2d 47 (Fla.1999).

GUNTHER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.