Matyjasik v. State (969 So. 2d 1142, 2007)

PER CURIAM.

Richard Matyjasik appeals from an order that summarily denied his motion pursuant to rule 3.800(a), Fla. R.Crim. P. (2007). The circuit court did not find that appellant’s claim was facially insufficient, nor did it attach records which conclusively refuted the claim. See Sheffield v. State, 903 So.2d 1009, 1011 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) citing (Anderson v. State, 627 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1993)). We therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings.

SHAHOOD, C.J., FARMER and MAY, JJ., concur.