Siplen v. State (969 So. 2d 1171, 2007)

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges the modification of his probationary sentence, which occurred fourteen months after the probationary sentence was imposed. The court modified Appellant’s probation to include electronic monitoring, a mandatory condition of probation. Because the modification did not occur within sixty days after Appellant’s sentencing,' the modification was erroneous. Fields v. State, 968 So.2d 1032 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007); Kiriazes v. State, 798 So.2d 789 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Accordingly, we reverse with the direction that the added condition of probation be stricken.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

THOMPSON, TORPY and LAWSON, JJ., concur.