J.J. v. State (970 So. 2d 388, 2007)

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. Garrett v. Morris Kirschman & Co., 336 So.2d 566, 569 (Fla.1976) (stating that a writing used to jog a witness’s memory may be admissible on some independent ground); T.B.S. v. State, 935 So.2d 98, 99 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (stating the fact-finder can use life experience to find that the statutory damage threshold has been met for self-evident repairs).