Smith v. State (971 So. 2d 901, 2007)

PER CURIAM.

We affirm defendant’s conviction and the order denying defendant’s new trial motion as we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court’s rulings. See Rivera v. State, 859 So.2d 495, 512 (Fla.2003); Goodwin v. State, 751 So.2d 537, 546-47 (Fla.1999). We remand this cause, however, with instructions that the court correct the defendant’s judgment of conviction to reflect that he was convicted of attempted carjacking, a second degree felony.