Young v. State (973 So. 2d 624, 2008)

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Wiley v. State, 604 So.2d 6 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992) (when the motion attacks the conviction it must be brought under rule 3.850); Burchfield v. State, 907 So.2d 614 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)(declining to construe a rule 3.800(a) motion as a rule 3.850 motion because the motion failed to comply with the pleading requirements found in rule 3.850).

BENTON and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

WEBSTER, J., concurs in result only.