Sirota v. State (977 So. 2d 700, 2008)

SHAHOOD, C.J.

Appellant, Keith Sirota, was found guilty following a jury trial of one count of soliciting a child under sixteen years of age via the internet, and three counts of transmission of material harmful to a minor. He raises six issues on appeal all of which we find to be without merit and affirm without discussion.

The judgment entered in this case contains a scrivener’s error showing that appellant entered a plea of guilty. In actuality, appellant entered a plea of not guilty and was convicted following a jury trial. We remand for correction of the scrivener’s error. See Newson v. State, 867 So.2d 603 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004). Appellant need not be present for this correction.

Affirmed; Remanded for Correction of Scrivener’s Error.

POLEN and MAY, JJ., concur.