Llorens v. State (983 So. 2d 772, 2008)

PER CURIAM.

We find the court did not abuse its authority in ordering restitution. See Glaubius v. State, 688 So.2d 913 (Fla.1997); State v. Hawthorne, 573 So.2d 330 (Fla.1991). The State concedes that a mathematical error was made in the amount ordered and that the proper amounts should have been $1168.72 for the necklace and $443.04 for the stereo. We herewith amend the judgment accordingly. See Lamb v. State, 732 So.2d 350 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999).

AFFIRMED; Judgment AMENDED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.