Leblanc v. State (985 So. 2d 1233, 2008)

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s first point, the legality of the fines imposed as part of his habitual offender sentence, was not preserved by contemporaneous objection or rule 3.800 motion. Accordingly, we affirm on this point without prejudice for Appellant to file a rule 3.800 motion. Polite v. State, 847 So.2d 1156, 1157 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).

We also affirm as to Appellant’s second point. See Massey v. State, 609 So.2d 598 (Fla.1992).

AFFIRMED.

PALMER, C.J., TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.