Herrera-Vega v. State (987 So. 2d 110, 2008)

PER CURIAM.

Herrera-Vega appeals from the summary denial of his Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. As to grounds 1, 2, 5, and 9, the trial court properly found that Herrera-Vega’s motion was facially insufficient. However, as conceded by the State, Herrera-Vega should have been granted the opportunity to file an amended motion, if he could do so in good faith. Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007). We affirm the remainder of the trial court’s order.

AFFIRMED, in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

PALMER, C.J., EVANDER and COHEN, JJ., concur.

. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850.