Citations

Full opinion text

PER CURIAM.

There is no basis in the evidence or law to support the determinations below that the appellant, a chiropractor, violated § 460.413(l)(d), Fla. Stat. See Rosenberg v. Dep’t of Prof'l Reg., Bd. of Chiropractic Exam’rs, 488 So.2d 153 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); Sherman v. Dep’t of Prof'l Reg., 452 So.2d 1128 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) (Anstead, C.J., concurring specially); see also Pub. Health Trust of Dade Co. v. Lopez, 531 So.2d 946 (Fla.1988); Hotel & Rest. Comm’n v. Sunny Seas No. One, Inc., 104 So.2d 570 (Fla.1958). Accordingly, the order imposing discipline upon appellant is reversed for dismissal of the proceeding below.

Reversed.

. "The following acts constitute grounds for denial of a license or disciplinary action, as specified in s. 456.072(2): ... (d) False, deceptive, or misleading advertising.”