Camon v. State (994 So. 2d 491, 2008)

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

SUAREZ, J.

We grant the State’s motion for rehearing, withdraw our prior opinion dated April 30, 2008, and substitute the following in its place:

Jerry Camón seeks to reverse the trial court’s summary denial of his motion to withdraw his plea and for appointment of counsel. We reverse, as Camón was entitled to the appointment of counsel.

After rejecting initial plea offers by the State, Camón participated in the plea colloquy and entered pleas in three cases. After sentencing, Camón filed a timely pro se motion to withdraw his pleas pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(Z), alleging coercion by his attorney in the plea process. The court summarily denied that motion and Camón did not appeal. Camón later filed an “amended” rule 3.170(£) motion to withdraw his pleas, a motion to appoint counsel, and a motion for evidentiary hearing, for the same reasons as before and adding claims of vindictive sentencing. The trial court denied the motion to withdraw as insufficient, citing to the plea colloquy. The clerk then advised the judge that there was also a motion to appoint counsel to advise Camón on the rule 3.170(i) motion. The court denied the motion and Camón appeals.

A post-sentence motion to withdraw a plea pursuant to rule 3.170(i) is a critical stage of criminal proceedings. The parties maintain that Camón was not represented by counsel at the time he filed his motion to withdraw the plea. At that point, the trial court was obligated to appoint counsel to advise Camón further. We reverse and remand, directing the trial court to appoint counsel to represent Ca-món in the preparation of a rule 3.170(Z) motion to withdraw his plea.

Reversed and remanded with directions.

. See Searcy v. State, 971 So.2d 1008 (Fla. 3d DCA 2008); accord Schriber v. State, 959 So.2d 1254, 1256 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

. See Schriber, 959 So.2d at 1254; Padgett v. State, 743 So.2d 70 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).