Citations

Full opinion text

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Caufield v. Cantele, 837 So.2d 371, 375 (Fla.2002) (reaffirming the traditional test for finality requiring that “no further action by the court will be necessary”). See also Staten v. Gonzalez-Falla, 855 So.2d 247 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (dismissing appeal of order that reserved jurisdiction to determine metes and bounds of easement granted by the order); Massachusetts Life Ins. Co. v. Crapo, 918 So.2d 393, 394 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (dismissing appeal of order that disposed of one of several interrelated claims).

LEWIS and THOMAS, JJ., and LAWRENCE, JR., L. ARTHUR, Senior-Judge, concur.