Budnick v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (101 So. 3d 938, 2012)

POLEN, J.

We affirm the final judgment because we find that the appellant’s general objection to bifurcation was not sufficient to preserve the perceived error that certain evidence should be allowed into evidence during Phase I of the proceedings. See Noel v. Broward Gen. Med. Ctr., 725 So.2d 438 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999); Corona v. State, 64 So.3d 1232 (Fla.2011); Steinhorst v. State, 412 So.2d 332 (Fla.1982); Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493 (Fla.1992).

Affirmed.

STEVENSON, J., and BONAVITA, AUGUST, Associate Judge, concur.