R.R. v. State (117 So. 3d 806, 2013)

Florida District Court of Appeal 2013-06-19

Citations

Full opinion text

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See P.W.G. v. State, 702 So.2d 488, 490-91 (Fla.1997) (juvenile court did not violate juvenile’s substantive due process rights in considering uncharged criminal activity in placement decision, given the differing goals of the juvenile delinquency and adult criminal systems).

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.