Frank v. Comerica Bank (134 So. 3d 1050, 2013)

PER CURIAM.

We affirm without discussion the trial court’s denial of Frank’s motion to quash service. We dismiss the remainder of Frank’s appeal. An order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of standing is not listed as an appealable non-final order under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to review the trial court’s order in regard to standing. Morton & Oxley, Ltd. v. Charles S. Eby, M.D., P.A., 916 So.2d 820, 821 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Supal v. Pelot, 469 So.2d 949, 950 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985).

Affirmed in part; dismissed in part.

DAMOORGIAN, C.J., CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.